Lets' be honest: the BCS is a piece of trash. It energizes unsportsmanlike conduct - and there truly is by all accounts a lot of that nowadays - by compelling groups to run up scores to keep up with high survey positions. It supports debasement by permitting survey citizens to influence sensational changes without a second to spare, bowing to political tension. It has brought about more fragile in general bowl matchups. Furthermore to top it all off, it denies us the capacity to settle the question of the title on the field. Coppery, who will confront 10th positioned and two misfortune Virginia Tech in the Sugar Bowl, are the primary group to go undefeated in the SEC and be denied a shot at the title. They beat three top ten groups, and a decent Tennessee group twice. Coppery would really be lucky to be under the pre-BCS framework in light of the fact that there would basically be the chance of sharing the title. California drove Texas in the BCS and was ready for a merited shot in the Rose Bowl until, without a second to spare, the final evening of school football - - on a night when Cal confronted an extreme rival in Southern Miss later a long excursion the nation over - - a few citizens raised Texas above Cal. This came following fourteen days of politicking by Texas mentor Matt Brown. There were even reports that a few voting forms in Texas were submitted before the games were even finished. California gave the chance to score an exceptionally late, negligible touch down, and all things considered, move affected their drop in the surveys. There could be at this point not any space for sportsmanship when a BCS bowl is on the line. A group seeking situating in the BCS must choose the option to pulverize its rivals. The connections the significant dishes currently need to meeting titles has brought about a 8-3 Pittburgh group playing undefeated Utah in the Fiesta Bowl, and a two misfortune Virginia Tech taking on undefeated Auburn in the Orange. In the mean time, one misfortune Cal takes on 7-4 Texas Tech in the Holiday Bowl. Are these the most ideal matchups that might have been assembled? ซีรีย์น่าดู I don't think the makers of the BCS imagined what we have now. I truly accept it was an endeavor to have something better. Yet, it's an ideal opportunity to concede that the framework is a disappointment, and continue on. The old framework is superior to what we have now. A season finisher framework is entirely attainable - - considering that it as of now exists in each game aside from significant school football - - and would create considerably more cash than the ebb and flow bowl framework. The contention that it would remove a lot of time from the players' homework is trash. Will we at any point know the genuine subtleties of the intrigue among the college presidents, the dishes, and quite a few gatherings, to deny us a fair season finisher framework? I question it. In any case, it is disgraceful that the leaders of the NCAA-part colleges permit such a framework, that energizes debasement and helpless sportsmanship, to exist.