I have watched football for my entire life and would presumably say I have an undesirable fixation on the game and like all fans I have my own thoughts of how to further develop it. My primary bogeyman however is the linesman/refs collaborator. In the first class in nations like England, Italy and Spain where cash is accessible for it for what reason do we just have two linesmen? Most likely it's a good idea to have four? Then, at that point they can settle on better decisions on decisions on if the ball went too far. Additionally it should improve the probability of an aggressor getting the opportunity to be vindicated in offside calls in case players are possibly given offside when the two linesmen raise their banners. Be that as it may, the fundamental explanation I have for pushing for four linesmen is on the grounds that a ref needs their assistance. The four linesman could then get on shirt pulling, elbows and different goings on that goes on out of perspective on the official. What irritates me the most is the conspicuous body checks and shirt pulls that go on out of perspective on the ref to stop a player making an altercation behind a protector. I do become ill of the media revealing to me that seeing players shipped off ruins the game when to my psyche what ruins the game are the negative alleged 'cunning' fouls that stop an aggressor in full stream for almost no discipline. Also I accept that if players got harsher discipline for those kind of fouls they would be much less inclined to submit them in any case. I don't really accept that they would prompt more appointments and red cards generally speaking, simply a bringing down of negative fouls. แทงบอลต่อ After all they said the banning of the tackle from behind would prompt most games finishing with somewhere around one player being shipped off however as we have seen all that has happened is that the players have modified their game to make up for the standard changes. The other thing, is that a linesman will then, at that point consistently be on the right half of the pitch - dissimilar to now where players can pull off removing corners from the quadrant and so forth in light of the fact that the linesman is on the opposite side of the pitch. Aside from little adjustments like this however I for one feel football has no compelling reason to change. Positively I would prefer not to see the arbitrator losing the force he right now has as while it may diminish the potential for defilement it would likewise lose the ideas that the ref gives by making human blunders. Let's be honest we as a whole need to discuss the ref not giving or giving a vital punishment, missing a foul and so on which gives us a simple pardon for our group losing instead of letting it out wasn't sufficient to beat the resistance. After everything who doesn't accept that their group is the best group there is? We as a whole realize that at each level, the fans serenade that their group is the best the world has seen despite the fact that we realize it isn't correct, we actually trust it. Having said that it would be an improvement if the match authorities, an agent of the two clubs that have recently played, and a free authority all plunked down after a match and went through the match video checking their choices. The club authorities could then question choices that the clubs couldn't help contradicting and review disciplines or respites could be passed out by the match ref.